What People are Commenting
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
WWIII, Lucia Handwriting & Fake Saints
Too Pessimist
Regarding your reply on Sister Lucia's handwriting, there is actually no way to prove any handwriting was done by Sister Lucia. There is even serious doubt that Sister Lucia was alive after 1959/1960 (why an imposter would be needed) which makes any Sister Lucia handwriting after 1960 suspect.
The Vatican hid Sister Lucia shortly after the 1917 apparitions and she has been silenced/censored Sister Lucia ever since then. So, why would they let her write anything for the public?
The Vatican could have censored and controlled anything claimed to come from Sister Lucia. Their control would include deploying a fake Sister Lucia. I suspect we will find that Catholics have been greatly fooled about Fatima. The only thing we know for certain concerning Fatima is the "Miracle of the Sun" happened, because it was witnessed by over 70,000 people and reported in newspaper, and everything else is questionable.
I suspect the consequences of the "Miracle of the Sun" relate to the Fatima secrets as well as Our Lady's messages of La Salette and Guadalupe.
Blessings,
M.B.
______________________
Devotion to New Saints
What is your stand or opinion about those holy men and women of the Church who were declared blessed or saint by the Novus Ordo Church but they lived before the Council, for example, Rolando Rivi, Bishop Ezekiel Moreno, Contardo Ferini and the likes.
Is it ok to have a private devotion to them and implore their intercession?
J.A.
______________________
TIA responds:
J.A.,
After the centuries-old criteria to beatify and canonize Catholics was abolished in 1983 when the New Code of Canon Law deleted the entire section containing the 141 canons of the 1917 Code of Canon Law that dealt with those processes, the new blessed and saints declared by the Conciliar Church are open to discussion.
Three cases exemplify well the lack of objectivity in the new processes:
- Fr. Antonio Rosmini previously was considered a heretic – 40 theses defended by him were condemned by the Church (cf. Denzinger nn. 1891-1930). However, the Conciliar Church disregarded all those proscribed errors and declared him a Blessed.
- John XXIII was a disciple and ardent admirer of Ernesto Bonaiutti, who was officially condemned as a modernist and excommunicated. Further, seven years ago the Freemasonic Lodge Grand Orient Democratico of Italy declared that he was a Mason. Nonetheless, without due investigation into these charges, the Conciliar Church declared him blessed and then a saint.
- Paul VI, according to credible witnesses, was a homosexual. This claim had previously stopped the investigation of his heroic virtues in the process of declaring him venerable. But later, the Conciliar Church declared him blessed and then a saint.
However, many of the persons who have been declared blessed or saints deserve to be included in the list of the Church’s Saints, such as:
- Fr. Charbel Macluf, a Lebanese Maronite monk who lived an exemplary contemplative life and is a true model for Catholics. He was declared Blessed in 1965 and a Saint in 1977.
- Bishop Ezechiel Moreno Diaz, a Spanish Prelate who became the Ordinary of Pasto in Colombia, played an important role against the Masons and Liberals. He was declared Blessed in 1975 and a Saint in 1992.
- Fr. Antonio de Santana Galvão, a Brazilian Franciscan friar known for his saintly life, who was one of the pioneers spreading the devotion of Slavery to Mary in that country and worked many miracles. He was declared Blessed in 1998 and a Saint in 2007.
If the new saints were only bad or questionable persons, they would not convince Catholics and the New Church would lose credibility. So, it mixes the bad persons with real Saints to try to pass the former as saints as well. It is a progressivist trick.
In the Reign of Mary these processes should all be reexamined.
Today, the faithful should have the discernment to distinguish the wheat from the chaff. Then, after separating the good from the bad ones, we may certainly venerate the good.
We hope that this analysis answers your question.
Cordially,
TIA correspondence desk
Posted October 15, 2026
______________________
The opinions expressed in this section - What People Are Commenting - do not necessarily express those of TIA
______________________
______________________
 |
 |
 |
The international situation is getting hotter and hotter. Besides the constant Russian threats (bluffs?) that it will nuke Europe, now we have more serious symptoms. Germany, Poland and the Baltic countries are seriously preparing for war. For example, this October 12, the top commander of NATO, Gen. Grinkewich, affirmed in a public interview that NATO is “ready to fight and win tonight.”
Even if the US is leaving NATO to the European countries, let us not forget that WWI and WWII started in Europe. Is WWIII coming soon?
Check the news report.
P.M.
the alliance would win a war with Russia
Jacob Wirtschafter
WARSAW, Poland — NATO’s top commander, U.S. Gen. Alexus Grynkewich, said Monday that the alliance is “ready to fight tonight” if Russia attacks and for the first time publicly laid out how the alliance would win.
“If someone is foolish enough to attack us, we will fight. We will stop the attack,” the U.S. Air Force general told an audience at the Warsaw Security Forum, just hours after the Kremlin rejected a Ukrainian truce offer. Poland, which borders Ukraine, Belarus and Russia’s Kaliningrad enclave, hosts about 10,000 American troops.
The general, who took over the NATO command in July 2025, urged the European leaders attending the annual defense conference to step up support for Ukraine in response to Russia’s increasingly aggressive actions against NATO members, including airspace violations, arson attacks, sabotage and cyberattacks.
Read more here