What People are Commenting
Nuclear Fleet, Milley & Precious Blood
Religion of the Antichrist
TIA,
Re: Is 'Tucho' Fernandez a 'gay'?
Yes. Vatican II is not a Catholic Church but it is made by the Talmudic Sodomites Paul VI and his minions. They are all an AntiChrist religion.
K.V.V.
Re: Is 'Tucho' Fernandez a 'gay'?
Yes. Vatican II is not a Catholic Church but it is made by the Talmudic Sodomites Paul VI and his minions. They are all an AntiChrist religion.
K.V.V.
______________________
Rainbow Flag on Feast of Sacred Heart
TIA,
Please see photo below from Dignity / Dominican Enmeshed Hospital in Post Catholic' Santa Cruz CA. taken yesterday.
This is how a Catholic hospital commemorates the feast day of the Sacred Heart of Jesus.
Viva Cristo Rey!
E.K.
Please see photo below from Dignity / Dominican Enmeshed Hospital in Post Catholic' Santa Cruz CA. taken yesterday.
This is how a Catholic hospital commemorates the feast day of the Sacred Heart of Jesus.
Viva Cristo Rey!
E.K.
![Catholic hospital with LGBT flag](Images/B_999_M593_Hos.jpg)
______________________
Shedding Some Light on January 6
Dear TIA,
We all know that January 6 was a trap to destroy the growing support Trump had/has and a way to deviate attention to the stolen election.
Independent of Trump's bad positions – pro- homosexual, pro-vaccine, pro-Putin etc. – that trap was an attempt by the left to attack the conservatives, who are the strongest force in the U.S.
Now, a little late … some light is shed on the plot that orchestrated that coup. One of the main protagonists of the plot is the now retired General Mark Milley.
Read the article below that starts to lift the shameful mantle of silence covering that vile episode of our history.
Keep up the good work.
G.L.
The Silent Insurrection: General Milley’s Hand on January 6
Haley Mclean
JUNE 06, 2024 - In the days and weeks leading up to January 6, the nation's highest-ranking military officer, then-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Mark Milley, was moving in lockstep with the political anxieties of top Democratic leaders.
These Democrats grew anxious as over 140 House Republicans planned to contest the election results during the electoral college certification that day. Milley was then deeply engaged with a circle of confidants including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, former Obama National Security Advisor Susan Rice, and former Defense Secretary Robert Gates, among others—all of whom shared a unified disdain for President Donald Trump.
At a House Oversight Committee hearing in April addressing the 3-hour and 19-minute delay in mobilizing the D.C. National Guard on January 6, Colonel Earl Matthews, one of four Department of Defense witnesses, testified about an “irrational” fear among a “clique” of senior military officers concerning the potential misuse of the National Guard by the president. He indicated that these concerns were influenced behind the scenes by Milley, who often made disparaging remarks about the president and regularly referred to his fear of a so-called potential “Reichstag moment.”
Meanwhile, Milley has insisted he maintained a posture of strict neutrality, vocally distancing his leadership of the military from the political turmoil surrounding the 2020 presidential election. "My job is to stay clean by ensuring that the uniformed military remains out of domestic politics," Milley stated during his testimony before the January 6 Select Committee. "The United States military has no role in domestic politics, period, full stop."
Nevertheless, accounts of Milley’s approach to the unfolding situation during the late days of the Trump administration, as detailed in Carol Leonnig and Philip Rucker's I Alone Can Fix It and Susan Glasser and Peter Baker’s August 2022 report in The New Yorker, present a picture of Milley that is much different from the disinterested persona he has disingenuously cultivated.
Continue to read here
We all know that January 6 was a trap to destroy the growing support Trump had/has and a way to deviate attention to the stolen election.
Independent of Trump's bad positions – pro- homosexual, pro-vaccine, pro-Putin etc. – that trap was an attempt by the left to attack the conservatives, who are the strongest force in the U.S.
Now, a little late … some light is shed on the plot that orchestrated that coup. One of the main protagonists of the plot is the now retired General Mark Milley.
Read the article below that starts to lift the shameful mantle of silence covering that vile episode of our history.
Keep up the good work.
G.L.
Haley Mclean
JUNE 06, 2024 - In the days and weeks leading up to January 6, the nation's highest-ranking military officer, then-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Mark Milley, was moving in lockstep with the political anxieties of top Democratic leaders.
These Democrats grew anxious as over 140 House Republicans planned to contest the election results during the electoral college certification that day. Milley was then deeply engaged with a circle of confidants including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, former Obama National Security Advisor Susan Rice, and former Defense Secretary Robert Gates, among others—all of whom shared a unified disdain for President Donald Trump.
At a House Oversight Committee hearing in April addressing the 3-hour and 19-minute delay in mobilizing the D.C. National Guard on January 6, Colonel Earl Matthews, one of four Department of Defense witnesses, testified about an “irrational” fear among a “clique” of senior military officers concerning the potential misuse of the National Guard by the president. He indicated that these concerns were influenced behind the scenes by Milley, who often made disparaging remarks about the president and regularly referred to his fear of a so-called potential “Reichstag moment.”
Meanwhile, Milley has insisted he maintained a posture of strict neutrality, vocally distancing his leadership of the military from the political turmoil surrounding the 2020 presidential election. "My job is to stay clean by ensuring that the uniformed military remains out of domestic politics," Milley stated during his testimony before the January 6 Select Committee. "The United States military has no role in domestic politics, period, full stop."
Nevertheless, accounts of Milley’s approach to the unfolding situation during the late days of the Trump administration, as detailed in Carol Leonnig and Philip Rucker's I Alone Can Fix It and Susan Glasser and Peter Baker’s August 2022 report in The New Yorker, present a picture of Milley that is much different from the disinterested persona he has disingenuously cultivated.
Continue to read here
______________________
What about the Precious Blood Devotion
Greetings,
I am so happy to be able to address my concerns to an organization which is not allied with the Novus Ordo, or Opus Dei.
We have a devotion at our Traditional Church to the Precious Blood. During this Devotion, there is a new rosary prayed which is different from that of the Blessed Virgin. Further, there are meditations by an Italian Saint whose name I’ve forgotten, which at times seems at variance with the elocutions of Anne Catherine Emmerich and are usually read by a person I’m not familiar with. There are in addition rosaries and pictures which are given out at these devotions that are, apparently, given to us by the Vatican.
For some reason the whole thing just seems wrong, though, of course, the Most Precious Blood of Our Lord is very important, but devotions which include new rosaries bother me.
Could you please comment.
Thank you,
In Christo,
J.D.
TIA responds:
Greetings J.D.,
Thank you for trusting us to answer your question.
We have done a brief research on the Precious Blood Chaplet to answer another reader's question similar to your own. In principle, chaplets similar to the Rosary are not bad. For instance, the chaplet of the Seven Sorrows has many promises attached to it and is a praiseworthy devotion. Certainly, these chaplets should never take preference over the Rosary, as you noted, but they are good to pray when one has the time. It would seem that the Precious Blood Chaplet has nothing wrong with it in the words and prayers; however, its origins lead us to doubt its authenticity.
The Precious Blood Chaplet originated with the supposed apparitions to a man named Barnabas beginning around 1996. It is not difficult to be convinced that this is not a real apparition when listening to this video recording of Barnabas singing his devotion, a highly sentimental melody. In this other video, we can see Barnabas in person giving a talk, and he does not appear to be very holy or worthy of Our Lord’s favors.
It is true that many of the things Our Lord is reported to have said in the apparition seem to be true, as they explain the crisis in the Church. However, this is not rare in false apparitions. It is a easy way to “sell” he false apparition to a certain public. In addition to these good messages, there is always something that Our Lord is reported to have said that is contrary to traditional Catholicism, which can be seen in Barnabas' praise of John Paul II, whose holiness can surely be questioned, as you can read here, here and here.
More problems with the supposed apparitions are explained in the following article here. We do not believe that all of the reasons the theologian mentions in this video are entirely correct – for instance, he claims that it is a heresy to say that evil can take over the Church, which is contrary to the message of La Salette for example – but his reasoning in general seems to be sufficient to refute the Precious Blood Chaplet.
We hope this helps to answer your question and concerns.
Cordially,
TIA correspondence desk
I am so happy to be able to address my concerns to an organization which is not allied with the Novus Ordo, or Opus Dei.
We have a devotion at our Traditional Church to the Precious Blood. During this Devotion, there is a new rosary prayed which is different from that of the Blessed Virgin. Further, there are meditations by an Italian Saint whose name I’ve forgotten, which at times seems at variance with the elocutions of Anne Catherine Emmerich and are usually read by a person I’m not familiar with. There are in addition rosaries and pictures which are given out at these devotions that are, apparently, given to us by the Vatican.
For some reason the whole thing just seems wrong, though, of course, the Most Precious Blood of Our Lord is very important, but devotions which include new rosaries bother me.
Could you please comment.
Thank you,
In Christo,
J.D.
______________________
TIA responds:
Greetings J.D.,
Thank you for trusting us to answer your question.
We have done a brief research on the Precious Blood Chaplet to answer another reader's question similar to your own. In principle, chaplets similar to the Rosary are not bad. For instance, the chaplet of the Seven Sorrows has many promises attached to it and is a praiseworthy devotion. Certainly, these chaplets should never take preference over the Rosary, as you noted, but they are good to pray when one has the time. It would seem that the Precious Blood Chaplet has nothing wrong with it in the words and prayers; however, its origins lead us to doubt its authenticity.
The Precious Blood Chaplet originated with the supposed apparitions to a man named Barnabas beginning around 1996. It is not difficult to be convinced that this is not a real apparition when listening to this video recording of Barnabas singing his devotion, a highly sentimental melody. In this other video, we can see Barnabas in person giving a talk, and he does not appear to be very holy or worthy of Our Lord’s favors.
It is true that many of the things Our Lord is reported to have said in the apparition seem to be true, as they explain the crisis in the Church. However, this is not rare in false apparitions. It is a easy way to “sell” he false apparition to a certain public. In addition to these good messages, there is always something that Our Lord is reported to have said that is contrary to traditional Catholicism, which can be seen in Barnabas' praise of John Paul II, whose holiness can surely be questioned, as you can read here, here and here.
More problems with the supposed apparitions are explained in the following article here. We do not believe that all of the reasons the theologian mentions in this video are entirely correct – for instance, he claims that it is a heresy to say that evil can take over the Church, which is contrary to the message of La Salette for example – but his reasoning in general seems to be sufficient to refute the Precious Blood Chaplet.
We hope this helps to answer your question and concerns.
Cordially,
TIA correspondence desk
Posted June 11, 2024
![Blason de Charlemagne](../images/Blason.png)
______________________
The opinions expressed in this section - What People Are Commenting - do not necessarily express those of TIA
______________________
______________________
The media is not spotlighting it, but tomorrow an entire Russian nuclear fleet will be docking at Havana. It includes one of the latest nuclear submarines, which can launch nuclear missiles that reach New York and Washington, as well as many other important cities in the East. There are also other warships in the fleet capable of causing a great deal damage to us.
It is Putin’s response to the permission Biden gave to Ukraine to use American weapons that can hit targets inside Russian territory.
With this move alone we have the perspective of WWIII brought to our borders.
We should think about it and be spiritually and materially prepared, should we not?
For details, watch this news report.
In Christ Jesus,
E.J.