No, thanks
Movie Review
donate Books CDs HOME updates search contact

Mass of the Ages - 4

Guardians of Tradition:
A Plea for Coexistence & Nothing More

Review of Mass of the Ages Trilogy,
Documentary directed by Cameron O’Hearn,
produced by O’Hearn & Jonathan Weiss, 2021-202
4

Rita Stewart
guardians of tradition

A conciliatory position,
open to all ‘reasonable’ compromises

The third and final Mass of the Ages episode, titled Guardians of Tradition, builds upon the prior two, culminating in a cohesive argument that accentuates the sophistic reasoning behind this series. The argument essentially is this: “The Latin Mass is not divisive; let traditionalists co-exist in peace.”

Presenting Benedict XVI as a model Pope, it suggests that things have simply gotten out of hand during Francis’ reign. Hopefully, it opines, in the near future, traditional Catholics will have more liberty to attend the Latin Mass.

As we will see, this pacifist line of thinking undermines the authentically conservative position by paving the way for compromise with progressivist doctrines and customs.

A plea to Pope Francis

As the first two episodes focus on beauty and truth, respectively, this one strives to showcase the goodness of the Latin Mass. It revolves around La Voie Romaine, a pilgrimage of French mothers of Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter (FSSP) and the Institute of Christ the King (ICKSP) priests. The mothers determined to walk from Paris to the Vatican to deliver to the Pope 2,500 letters from persons who desire to preserve the traditional Mass.

pilgrims

The priests’ mothers don shorts & pants for their pilgrimage; below, nothing comes from the brief presentation

pilgrimage

‘We walked from Paris to Rome to you.’
‘Ah,yes. Ah, yes.’

A spirit of false optimism and pure naiveté permeates the pilgrimage. The documentary insinuates elsewhere that Francis may indeed be a poor leader, but the mothers seem to believe that he might change his mind on the traditional Mass if he just hears their perspective.

Perhaps the Pope fails to understand the good fruits of the Latin Mass, the documentary posits. He himself has only ever said the Novus Ordo; thus he might simply be out of touch with those who find great spiritual solace in Tradition.

The mothers’ attachment to the Latin Mass seems to be more a personal preference than a conviction based on a firm ideological foundation. They emphasize that this Mass has been spiritually beneficial for their sons and the wider community, yet they seem tolerant toward the Novus Ordo. One mother remarks: “A very high proportion of letters, around 40%, have been written by people who attend the Ordinary Form, who also see Traditionis Custodes as a loss.”

Because of this, it is no surprise that the mothers are tethered to modern habits. For example, they dress in shorts, sleeveless tops, and sneakers, and even fail to wear veils in church. This is an implicit denial of the broader cultural crisis in society.

The women are disappointed when, after two months of walking, the Pope only greets them from his vehicle on Vatican square and speaks shortly to one of them, who is not even wearing a skirt or the traditional black when she presents the signature petition. Nothing came of the meeting. Nothing changed in the progressivist Church.

Good fruits of the Latin Mass

To further convey the good fruits of the Latin Mass, the documentary then showcases several traditional communities. Faithful Catholics in Jalisco and Tanzania share their profound love for the Latin Mass, emphasizing that it has changed their lives. This demonstrates the universality of this ancient liturgy.

good fruit

Good fruit: The large family at
a traditional Baptism of its new baby

Leah and Ricky Soldinie also describe their positive experiences with the Latin Mass, but not before criticizing one traditional parish for purportedly being “judgmental.” The parishioners were unfriendly toward Mr. Soldinie because he wore a casual pair of shorts and a t-shirt to Mass.

The Soldinies explain that, to their relief, they later visited other traditional parishes that were more welcoming and less “judgmental.”After they realized tolerance has citizenship in the traditionalist churches, they appreciated this liturgy and made it a point to attend. They also learned, in due time, to dress better for Mass.

Traditionis Custodes

The documentary goes on to suggest that Traditionis Custodes may not actually reflect the desires of most Bishops. The report on the Bishops’ comments was more positive than expected. Some Bishops did call attention to “problems” with the Latin Mass: One said that “some people who support the Extraordinary Form do so with ideological presuppositions.”

father fessio

Fr Fessio of Ignatius Press puts no blame on Vatican II or the Conciliar Popes

One Bishop who praised the Mass noted: “It has not been my experience that the Extraordinary Form causes division, but rather the opposite.” Another wrote that traditional Catholics, in his experience, do not necessarily oppose Vatican II.

The film commentator claims: “Bishops are seeing churches burgeoning, overflowing with young families with many kids, who are joyfully faithful to the Magisterium.” Though he does not explain what he means, it seems that he is equating the Magisterium with the post-Conciliar Church.

A questionable ideology

First, the documentary can be criticized for the bad customs that oppose the spirit of Christian modesty and decorum which it promotes. As TIA has demonstrated, good customs are an essential component of Catholic Civilization. When they decline, so does the Faith. It is not judgmental to insist upon proper dress and decorum for Mass.

Worse, the documentary adopts a middle-of-the-road position that places Traditionalism in a position of constant defense. It suggests that we must tiptoe around the modern Vatican and acquiesce to reasonable demands. Frequently we hear the affirmations that “we are not dissident” and “we do not have ideological presuppositions.” Sadly, the lady doth protest too much, methinks…

archbishop emeritus

The Cardinal of Guadalajara: ‘Let them have it, but of course keep what we have also...’

What the documentary forgets to mention is that traditional Catholicism is militant. Faithful Catholics must not give an inch to progressivists, but should instead fight strongly for the Faith and against those who deviate even an inch from it. If the Novus Ordo has the flavor of heresy, then we cannot tolerate it. If Vatican II is ambiguous and its application has given bad and heretical fruit, then we have a duty to oppose it. If the Chair of Peter has been usurped, then, as St. Francis de Sales wrote, “It is a work of charity to shout ‘Here is the wolf!’ when it enters the flock or anywhere else.”

Imagine if the Crusaders had laid down their weapons upon arrival in the Holy Land, declaring: “We come in peace. We do not oppose the Islamic rule; all we ask is to peacefully venerate the sites that are important to our Faith. Let the dialogue begin.” How absurd would this be?

Yet, this is not unlike the tactics this documentary employs. In truth, the progressivist takeover of the Vatican is just as insidious as the Islamic conquest of the Holy Land, for it has no legitimate rights and has distorted the face of the Church.

“Supreme Catholic intransigence is nothing but supreme Catholic charity,” wisely affirms Fr. Felix Sardá y Salvany. Rather than beg the progressivist hierarchy to retain the already compromised 1962 Latin liturgy, it is more charitable to fully and wholly resist the bad actions of the hierarchy and insist upon God’s absolute right to be worshipped in a manner befitting His infinite majesty, as well as the right of the age-old Magisterium to be restored and respected as was and always should be.

Share

Blason de Charlemagne
Follow us



Posted March 10, 2025
Related Topics of Interest
Related Works of Interest


A_civility.gif - 33439 Bytes A_courtesy.gif - 29910 Bytes A_family.gif - 22354 Bytes