It Is Forbidden to Interpret the Scripture |
Contrary to Its Traditional Meaning
The Council of Trent gives us another argument to counter the "historical method" of interpreting the Holy Books largely adopted by Pope Benedict XVI in his book Jesus of Nazareth. Below you can read a decree of the Council of Trent that specifically addresses this topic on the interpretation of Catholic doctrine and Holy Scriptures.
Council of Trent
In order to restrain insolent spirits, it [the Council of Trent] decrees that no one, relying on his own skill, shall – in matters of Faith and of Morals pertaining to the structure of Christian doctrine – distort the Sacred Scripture as he pleases, presuming to interpret the same Holy Scripture contrary to that sense which Holy Mother Church – to whom it falls to judge the true sense and interpretation of the Holy Scriptures – has held and does hold; nor shall anyone interpret Scriptures contrary to the unanimous consent of the Fathers, even if such interpretations were never intended to be published.
Let those who go against this be denounced by their Ordinaries, and be punished according to the penalties established by law.
“Decree concerning the Edition and the Use of the Sacred Books,”
Documentos Pontifícios, n. 95, Petrópolis: Vozes, 1959, p. 6
Posted September 10, 2011
Related Topics of Interest
Pius XII: Historicism Is Not Catholic
Leo XIII: Impossible to Have Error in the Bible
St. Pius X: ‘Historical Method’ Is Modernist
Benedict XVI's Different Religion
Benedict XVI: ‘For Many’ Means ‘For All’
Benedict’s New Book Contradicts Church Teaching on Jews
Fr. Ratzinger: The Bible Is Not Objective
Fr. Ratzinger Was under Suspicion of Heresy
Card. Ratzinger: I Did Not Change
Card. de Lubac: Ratzinger Destroyed the Holy Office
Related Works of Interest