What People are Commenting
Netanyahu, St. Hubert’s Mass & TIA’ Pix
Mass of St. Hurbert
TIA,
We Catholics have it all! Here is a Mass played on hunting horn (a horn with no stops; difficult to play) in honor of the patron of hunting, St. Hubert, a 7th-8th century Frenchman, later a bishop. No words, and doubtfully suitable for Mass, but impressive.
P.O.B.
We Catholics have it all! Here is a Mass played on hunting horn (a horn with no stops; difficult to play) in honor of the patron of hunting, St. Hubert, a 7th-8th century Frenchman, later a bishop. No words, and doubtfully suitable for Mass, but impressive.
P.O.B.
______________________
Inducing Men to Sin
Dear Atila Sinke Guimarães,
Greetings,
I am very happy to have found TIA webpage. I like the huge amount of Catholic information and also the articles about saints and words by Prof. Plinio Corrêa de Oliveira. But what is most important: I have found very enlightening information. For example about the problems about the 1962 missal (I have this from Angelus Press). Now I definitely want a new missal (I´ll start looking for it if I have more time). And wow... how they changed the Holy Week! I go to SSPX and they celebrate the 1962, but I wish to learn more about liturgy before the missal reforms.
I also liked articles about women. That women should not do professional sports, about fashion etc. And of course bringing out all the problems in the Vatican. But there is one big problem in this. The pictures. For example talks how women should be modest and should not do some sports or that Pope Francis was watching a circus show. The pictures show the problem. And this is a problem. I don´t think men should watch such pictures. Of course this is what is seen everywhere in human society these days. But I don´t think it pleases God if we take pictures of it. Because the picture might lead men to sin. I have come to this conclusion in time (I am a convert) and I have found out that this is one big problem in all traditional circles. I prefer the mentality of the Middle Ages.
But I look forward to reading more in TIA and wishing you a happy new year!
In Christ and Mary
L.K.
The editor responds:
Dear L.K.,
We at TIA are very glad about the benefit that our website has provided to you. Thank you for your noble recognition of it. I really hope that not only such support continues, but that it can generate a closer collaboration between you and TIA.
The objection on the immoral aspect of some pictures is due not to our desire to show sensual photos, but rather to a need that we have to open the eyes of countless middle-of-the-road Catholics who are always trying to justify the progressivist prelates, principally the conciliar Popes. If we would cover or blur the immoral parts of those photos – we do blur the indecent and obscene parts – they would say that we are maliciously imagining immoralities that are not demonstrated. So, to silence these objectors, we are obliged to show that this or that Prelate, this or that Pope, actually allowed such scenes to be performed in his presence.
If we were not to silence the middle-of-the road current, it would completely anesthetize the reaction against Progressivism. Actually, this is the reason why this current is the most efficient ally of Progressivism.
We also have other reasons to document those scandals, which we have explained to other objectors who were not as kind as you. You may read them here, here, here and here.
We are very sorry that some men could be induced to sin looking at those pictures. We pray they can transcend this tendency and see the imperative reason we have to expose the scandal. We habitually place a bold red warning to inform the reader that he will find graphic photos. This is meant to allow those who are weak in the practice of purity to avoid those pictures and not be taken by surprise.
I thank you for the cordial way you addressed your objection, and I hope my answer will help you understand that we need to practically demonstrate to what point Progressivism has infiltrated the Holy Church.
Cordially,
Atila S. Guimarães
Greetings,
I am very happy to have found TIA webpage. I like the huge amount of Catholic information and also the articles about saints and words by Prof. Plinio Corrêa de Oliveira. But what is most important: I have found very enlightening information. For example about the problems about the 1962 missal (I have this from Angelus Press). Now I definitely want a new missal (I´ll start looking for it if I have more time). And wow... how they changed the Holy Week! I go to SSPX and they celebrate the 1962, but I wish to learn more about liturgy before the missal reforms.
I also liked articles about women. That women should not do professional sports, about fashion etc. And of course bringing out all the problems in the Vatican. But there is one big problem in this. The pictures. For example talks how women should be modest and should not do some sports or that Pope Francis was watching a circus show. The pictures show the problem. And this is a problem. I don´t think men should watch such pictures. Of course this is what is seen everywhere in human society these days. But I don´t think it pleases God if we take pictures of it. Because the picture might lead men to sin. I have come to this conclusion in time (I am a convert) and I have found out that this is one big problem in all traditional circles. I prefer the mentality of the Middle Ages.
But I look forward to reading more in TIA and wishing you a happy new year!
In Christ and Mary
L.K.
______________________
The editor responds:
Dear L.K.,
We at TIA are very glad about the benefit that our website has provided to you. Thank you for your noble recognition of it. I really hope that not only such support continues, but that it can generate a closer collaboration between you and TIA.
The objection on the immoral aspect of some pictures is due not to our desire to show sensual photos, but rather to a need that we have to open the eyes of countless middle-of-the-road Catholics who are always trying to justify the progressivist prelates, principally the conciliar Popes. If we would cover or blur the immoral parts of those photos – we do blur the indecent and obscene parts – they would say that we are maliciously imagining immoralities that are not demonstrated. So, to silence these objectors, we are obliged to show that this or that Prelate, this or that Pope, actually allowed such scenes to be performed in his presence.
If we were not to silence the middle-of-the road current, it would completely anesthetize the reaction against Progressivism. Actually, this is the reason why this current is the most efficient ally of Progressivism.
We also have other reasons to document those scandals, which we have explained to other objectors who were not as kind as you. You may read them here, here, here and here.
We are very sorry that some men could be induced to sin looking at those pictures. We pray they can transcend this tendency and see the imperative reason we have to expose the scandal. We habitually place a bold red warning to inform the reader that he will find graphic photos. This is meant to allow those who are weak in the practice of purity to avoid those pictures and not be taken by surprise.
I thank you for the cordial way you addressed your objection, and I hope my answer will help you understand that we need to practically demonstrate to what point Progressivism has infiltrated the Holy Church.
Cordially,
Atila S. Guimarães
______________________
St. Bernard’s Decisive Text
Dear TIA Representative,
Blessed be the Most Holy Family, Jesus, Mary and Joseph! - and Compliments of the Holy Sealon!
Thank you for your thorough response to my email which is found at - Navy Drag Queens & Importance of Canons
However, I confess, I was not satisfied as I did not want to make a decision on my own, on the inherent importance of canons. A lay person with ordinary Faith can certainly err in such matters. Providentially, recently, I found the answer I was looking for when the St. Bernard's issue of From the Housetops contained the Profession of Faith of Pope Pius IV, also found under Denzinger 1000:
Also all other things taught, defined, and declared by the sacred canons and ecumenical Councils, and especially by the sacred and holy Synod of Trent, (and by the ecumenical Council of the Vatican, particularly concerning the primacy of the Roman Pontiff and his infallible teaching), I without hesitation accept and profess; and at the same time all things contrary thereto, and whatever heresies have been condemned, and rejected, and anathematized by the Church, I likewise condemn, reject and anathematize.
End of quote.
Personally, I believe that if bishops seriously regulated the disparaged canon from Lateran IV given as an example in The Latin Mass issue mentioned in my original email, I think our diocese (Buffalo, NY) would not, currently, have had to file for bankruptcy.
Thank you for your willingness to answer difficult questions put to you in these most fractionating times in the Catholic Church.
Yours in the Most Holy Rosary,
W.C.
Blessed be the Most Holy Family, Jesus, Mary and Joseph! - and Compliments of the Holy Sealon!
Thank you for your thorough response to my email which is found at - Navy Drag Queens & Importance of Canons
However, I confess, I was not satisfied as I did not want to make a decision on my own, on the inherent importance of canons. A lay person with ordinary Faith can certainly err in such matters. Providentially, recently, I found the answer I was looking for when the St. Bernard's issue of From the Housetops contained the Profession of Faith of Pope Pius IV, also found under Denzinger 1000:
Also all other things taught, defined, and declared by the sacred canons and ecumenical Councils, and especially by the sacred and holy Synod of Trent, (and by the ecumenical Council of the Vatican, particularly concerning the primacy of the Roman Pontiff and his infallible teaching), I without hesitation accept and profess; and at the same time all things contrary thereto, and whatever heresies have been condemned, and rejected, and anathematized by the Church, I likewise condemn, reject and anathematize.
End of quote.
Personally, I believe that if bishops seriously regulated the disparaged canon from Lateran IV given as an example in The Latin Mass issue mentioned in my original email, I think our diocese (Buffalo, NY) would not, currently, have had to file for bankruptcy.
Thank you for your willingness to answer difficult questions put to you in these most fractionating times in the Catholic Church.
Yours in the Most Holy Rosary,
W.C.
Posted January 2, 2024
______________________
The opinions expressed in this section - What People Are Commenting - do not necessarily express those of TIA
______________________
______________________
In my limited time at the computer today, I watched this which provided a look into Zionist thinking.
Sharing this video can be very enlightening. It was produced by a Turkish public broadcast service: a 13-minute documentary showing how Jewish Zionists believe that Benjamin Netanyahu is prophesied to be Israel’s last leader before their “Messiah” comes. This could explain some of his recent actions.
I found it to be well worth watching to understand the mindset, politics and current war maneuvers. I also was shocked to see footage of President Ronald Reagan honoring the Zionist "Rebbe" and to realize the impact of such Zionist influence within America over the decades.
Thank you for your continued prayers for my healing.
Christmas blessings,
E.Z.