Hate Mail
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Progressivist, Sede & Schismatic Fuss
Heretic & Gnostic
"After Original Sin, God cursed the Serpent and established two races: the race of the Virgin and the race of the Serpent, which would fight each other throughout History."
(AI) Claiming that God established two literal, biological "races" or bloodlines – one physically descended from God/the Virgin and one physically from Satan/the Serpent (the "Serpent Seed" or two-seedline doctrine) – is considered a serious theological error and heresy by the Catholic Church and mainstream Christianity.
Why It Is Considered Heretical
Distortion of Genesis 3:15: The Catholic Church interprets Genesis 3:15 (the Protoevangelium) as the first announcement of the Messiah and a spiritual battle between the offspring/followers of the woman and the spiritual influence of the devil, not the creation of two separate human races.
Biological vs. Spiritual Lineage: The "seed of the serpent" in orthodox Christian theology refers to those who choose to follow evil and imitate Satan's rebellion, not a physical or genetic race of human beings.
Gnostic Roots: Variations of dual-seed or hyper-dualistic genealogical views originated in early Gnostic sects (such as Valentinianism), which taught that certain humans possessed divine spiritual seeds by nature while others were inherently damned. The early Church Fathers, like St. Irenaeus, explicitly condemned these notions.
Racial Determinism and Racism: Modern iterations of the "two seedline" or "serpent seed" theory often map these supposed biological bloodlines onto modern ethnic groups or races. The Catholic Church teaches the unity of the human race, that all humans share common first parents (Adam and Eve), and that the offer of the Gospel and salvation through Christ is universal to every human being regardless of ethnicity.
A.P.
______________________
Bunch of Marshmallows
60 yrs this foolishness has been going on with the back and forth. Lay people have had just about enough. If they don’ care about their souls we still do.
So If you guys want to be protestants then pack up and leave so we REAL CATHOLICS can have the VATICAN back. Every day one of these goof-balls insults and blasphemes Our Lord and Our Lady.
Joan of Arc would have kicked them out 59 yrs ago. We are a bunch of marshmellows....we need to fight for Our Lord and quit messing around.
just had to say this
K.A.
______________________
You Exude Bad Will
“The Pope still has to consecrate Russia ergo Fatima disproves Sede-vacantism”
FALSE, Pope Pius XII already consecrated Russia on Jul. 07, 1952 to the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
Pope Pius XII, Sacro Vergente Anno (Apostolic Letter), July 7, 1952: “…just as a few years ago We consecrated the entire human race to the Immaculate Heart of the Virgin Mary, Mother of God, so today We consecrate and in a most special manner We entrust all the peoples of Russia to this Immaculate Heart…”
But didn’t Our Lady promise that Russia would be consecrated in union with all the bishops of the world? No! This is a key point. Our Lady requested that Russia be consecrated in union with all the bishops of the world, but on July 13 she only promised that “In the end my Immaculate Heart will triumph. The Holy Father will consecrate Russia to me, and it will be converted and a certain period of peace will be granted to the world.” Notice that Our Lady didn’t promise: “The Holy Father and all the bishops will consecrate Russia to me…” Further, heaven revealed that the actual fulfillment of the consecration of Russia would not be fully in accord with heaven’s original wishes; for instance, it would be “late”.
There will be no “Great Catholic monarch” (unless that’s Jesus Christ Himself) and resurgence of Catholicism. The end comes when Christ is preached throughout the earth and is reject. That has already happened with the evangelization of the world by the Church and the subsequent Vatican II Apostasy.
Finally, the Papal seat is most definitely vacant. Heretics are not members of the Church, and the Vatican II Antipopes are obstinate notorious public heretics. You can be notorious in law and notorious in fact, with the latter not requiring a declaration. To deny these fact in the face of the facts is to exude bad will.
Yes it does matter if the men purporting to be the vicars of Christ.
Please convert to True, Traditional Catholicism.
Ad Iesum per Mariam
S.H.
______________________
You Are Not Considerate
The link below, authored by a Traditional Catholic on his website offers a very blunt and direct criticism to Dr. Horvat and TIA with regards to your website's continued criticism of FSSPX; especially its recent consecration of four bishops without the Vatican's permission. The author, Nich Flüe, does provide specific, rational points worth consideration.
Regardless, Dr. Horvat and TIA, in my humble opinion, need to be more considerate of what the Catholic laity worldwide is confronted with what is likely a worldwide catastrophic situation for the Church and mankind, and how Catholic prophecies clearly illustrate that SSPX is not necessarily in schism -- perhaps it is the Vatican leadership that is. Click on the link below to review.
SSPX Excommunication Debate
Regards
J.W.
______________________
You Are Slanderous
I’m a born Catholic Italian American Latin rite who has taken great appreciation and interest in the eastern rite of the Catholic Church. Specifically the Italo-Albanian, Melkite, ruthenian, and other byzantine. I feel as if my Holy heavenly mother Mary Has sent me to the east as Saint Nikon’s earthly mother of (Napoli 249-251 A.D.) sent him eastward. I also take great inspiration from Saint Nilus Of Rossano (910-1005AD)
Who’s Byzantine monastery outside of Rome never broke communion after the schism and is still there today “in the west”
I was reading an article on your website titled “Prostrations in Catholic Eastern Rites” and I came across some very, in my opinion, disturbing comments towards the practice of prostrations.
One example was
“they are not part of Roman Catholic Tradition in general”
- this seems to be an odd analysis since it is from the prince of the Apostles and the mouthpiece of Christ (st Paul) whom we derive our very faith. And Jesus prostrated.
Another comment was
“The Latin Rite equally preserves the necessary attitude of humility before God, with its own postures and devotions. It was with Vatican II’s Novus Ordo, that such reverence was so quickly abandoned, and not from the lack of Eastern Catholic postures.”
-this seems to me a quite egregious critique of the beauty and strength of Vatican 2. It also seems to be a statement that is mis leading and not well inform on the intentions and Holy Spirit through the council.
Speaking in inspiration of Vatican 2 and in commemoration of an earlier encyclical our great Pope Saint John Paul the second in “Orientale Lumen” writes that it is a NECESSITY for us in the Latin rite to familiarize ourselves with eastern practices from which WE TAKE OUR ROOT.
Knowing this to then say we have abandoned it is untrue. As Saint Saint Athanasius revived hope within the church can God Raise up someone to restore communion and comfort and familiarity between eastern and western practices? Hasn’t it only been 1 day in Gods eyes since the schism?
The next comment:
In my opinion, it is not correct or appropriate to introduce prostrations into the Latin Rite any more than it would be appropriate to make Eastern Catholics use Gregorian chant or replace their sacred liturgical languages with Latin. What is unique in each of the Apostolic Rites has been preserved by Sacred Tradition and handed down intact for a reason. Who would dare to alter what God has deemed worthy to preserve?
Would making prostrations during Eucharistic adoration if my priest regularly tells me “pray in whatever manner you like for 15 minutes before the blessed Lord” be introducing a foreign act? Would doing the actions of the prince of the apostles my beloved be wrong and an introduction of something that is not of our tradition? I say the fathers are on the side of prostrations modern day and old day fathers.
- the most sad and down rite wrong comment of this whole article was this Margaret Galitzin’s comments are entirely with merit. The concerns raised are legitimate. Encouraging Catholics to now implement what has become commonly recognized as a Mohammedan posture is a highly suspect position and appears to bolster the ecumenical tendency for Syncretism and Religious Indifferentism.
- a mohammedan posture?
How can one admit in the same article that prostrations are scattered all throughout the holy Bible. Performed by our Lord God and savior Jesus Christ. Performed by the apostles and fathers of the Church east and west for Atleast 1,300 years. And still preserved in some places “in the west” and still call this a Mohammedan posture without slandering mother church? Is not a false prophet taking what is true and good a usurping of the righteous?
Conclusion:
If one in the recognization of the Holy spirit in Vatican 2 feels drawn to prostrations in any Catholic Church it is in line with Peter the prince of the apostles and Saint Paul the mouthpiece of Christ which our tradition can never abandon never forget never be said to “get from pagan Mohammedans” or any of such slanderous thinking. 700 years of “ant-east”
And eastern “anti- west” does not mean each others “traditions” are not one and the same. Rooted in the King of All who will flash like lightning from east to west.
With great concern and love,
A.L.
Posted September 22, 2026
______________________
______________________
Re: Be Thou Peter!
I was in Fr. DePauw’s classes in the seminary in the mid 60s. This guy was as sincere as they get, but we all knew something was wrong with him. We all, students and faculty, thought he was “off” some some way. His classes in canon law were the most boring classes I took over my 7 years in the seminary.
I see in this letter a very intelligent man, but a man completely out of touch with the Holy Spirit and the law of love, kindness, joy and peace. Progress also means leaving some things behind.
I give Gommar great credit for his courage, but he missed the voice of the Holy Spirit when He said the cloud is moving. When the cloud moves, move with it.
L.S.