Right to Life
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Official Report on the Pandemic - II
The Human Origins of Covid-19
Almost as soon as the Covid-19 Pandemic began, questions started circulating as to the origin of the virus used to justify mass worldwide closures, societal upheaval and vaccination mandates. As the epicenter for the virus was known to be the city of Wuhan, China, suspicion naturally began to arise over the American funded Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).
/E134_WIV.jpg)
The logical question immediately arose: Was this unusually virulent illness an escaped product of the virology lab? Almost as quickly the verdict came from official sources that any discussion of the subject was not only wrong, but also a dangerous conspiracy theory. In a surreal display of group-think, social media users began to attack those who even entertained this reasonable possibility. News outlets around the world carried the same story: A lab leak was all but impossible. The experts affirmed it and we must “trust the experts,” of course.
Now, years later, the Select Subcommittee of the House of Representatives investigation led by Col. Wenstrup has concluded that the lab leak theory is not only the most probable reality, but that the WIV engaged in flagrant disregard for safety practices, lied about its activities, and misused funds for dangerous research. Its parent company, EcoHealth, obfuscated investigations and, as of publication, has withheld the labs notes.
Public officials further covered up this reality, lying to the world in an effort to appease the Chinese Communist Party. This is not speculation. It is the well documented conclusion of the Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic.
Given that this is the conclusion of the Subcommittee, what evidence supports the theory that the virus was manmade?
Gain of function
In Virology the term gain-of-function refers to the practice of enhancing or adding certain functions of a virus, such as its transmissability or its deadliness. Did the WIV engage in gain-of-function research? Dr. Anthony Fauci, answering questions over the Pandemic, denied it (p. 170). Col. Wenstrup discovered otherwise.
/E134_Fau.jpg)
/E134_Das.jpg)
Indeed, EcoHealth had already announced its plans to engage in gain-of-function research in the WIV in 2018 (p. 3). Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth, has, to date, refused to furnish the lab notes relating to these experiments (pp. 84-101) and been caught lying during his sworn testimony to try and cover for EcoHealth’s failures (p. 76).
Yet further evidence surfaced upon investigation. In its own documents EcoHealth detailed experiments exposing mice to enhanced lab versions of viruses. Some groups of mice experienced only slightly increased mortality, but other mice experienced a large jump in deaths, indicating that the experimental virus for that group had inadvertently become much deadlier than anticipated. (p. 62). Given the jump in lethality this virus clearly qualified as having undergone gain-of-function.
In such an event safety protocol required EcoHealth to cease experiments and report its results before going further. It did neither. (pp. 81-82)
Denials & obfuscation
Late 2019, approximately the time the Pandemic began to make news, EcoHealth was due to submit its 5-year-report outlining all its activities and results. It would not do so for two years. Dr. Daszak claimed technical difficulties (p. 71). This denial was investigated and proved to be patently false (pp. 71-77). EcoHealth was instead frantically trying to cover its tracks and eliminate evidence related to its experiments in the years leading up to the outbreak.
As of writing Dr. Daszak is still obfuscating the investigation by refusing to yield the labs notes. Such behavior would be suspicious at best, the diligent research of the Subcommittee would uncover yet more incriminating evidence.
The smoking gun
Investigation shows the virus that causes Covid contains the telltale marks of human interference. The House Subcommittee notes a “furin cleavage site,” a type of protein sequence named for the FES Upstream Region gene (FUR), is found on the SARS2 virus and on no other virus in that branch of the SARS2 family (p. 3).
A few years prior EcoHealth had proposed to create just such a unique virus with a furin cleavage site as its defining feature in their lab at Wuhan (P. 3, 78). The furin cleavage site does not exist naturally in this family of viruses. It could thus only happen through laboratory interference.
/E134_Pre.png)
Furthermore, it is largely due to the virus possessing this particular protein sequence that made it so contagious to humans in the first place (p. 3). The fact that the WIV is known to conduct such experiments without even basic safety precautions, such as masks, only compounds their guilt.
Desperate attempts to locate an animal to host this virus have yielded no results. Previously when dangerous diseases surfaced, investigations were always able to trace such outbreaks to animals that had transferred them to humans. With Covid such investigations have found nothing.
Suspicions
Given the evidence uncovered by the Select Subcommittee, we can summarize the origins of the Pandemic as follows:
/E134_Wuh.jpg)
The Wuhan Institute of Virology is known for lax safety standards and carrying out experiments in open caves (p. 111), failing to wear masks (p. 3), failing to follow basic reporting protocol in the event of experiments getting out of control (pp. 62-65), and in 2018 expressed its intent to engineer a SARS2 virus with a heretofore novel furin cleavage site (p. 3). Less than 2 years later, in 2019 a surprisingly virulent SARS2 virus exhibiting an unnatural furin cleavage site appeared in the human population of Wuhan (p. 38) without any identified infected animal population (p. 4, 38, 42). The parent company, EcoHealth, scrambled to conceal documents and withhold its notes while its president and doctors demonstrably lied.
Yet in spite of all of the above evidence our “experts” assured us that the virus was almost certainly of natural origin and that to consider otherwise was baseless conspiracy theory.
We can trust the “experts,” can’t we?
To be continued
For the full 520 page After Action Review of the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Lessons Learned and a Path Forward, click here.
The infamous Wuhan Institute of Virology most probably was the source of the Pandemic
Now, years later, the Select Subcommittee of the House of Representatives investigation led by Col. Wenstrup has concluded that the lab leak theory is not only the most probable reality, but that the WIV engaged in flagrant disregard for safety practices, lied about its activities, and misused funds for dangerous research. Its parent company, EcoHealth, obfuscated investigations and, as of publication, has withheld the labs notes.
Public officials further covered up this reality, lying to the world in an effort to appease the Chinese Communist Party. This is not speculation. It is the well documented conclusion of the Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic.
Given that this is the conclusion of the Subcommittee, what evidence supports the theory that the virus was manmade?
Gain of function
In Virology the term gain-of-function refers to the practice of enhancing or adding certain functions of a virus, such as its transmissability or its deadliness. Did the WIV engage in gain-of-function research? Dr. Anthony Fauci, answering questions over the Pandemic, denied it (p. 170). Col. Wenstrup discovered otherwise.
Dr. Fauci attacked the lab leak theory, while Dr. Daszak, below, covered his tracks & lied about the lab notes
Yet further evidence surfaced upon investigation. In its own documents EcoHealth detailed experiments exposing mice to enhanced lab versions of viruses. Some groups of mice experienced only slightly increased mortality, but other mice experienced a large jump in deaths, indicating that the experimental virus for that group had inadvertently become much deadlier than anticipated. (p. 62). Given the jump in lethality this virus clearly qualified as having undergone gain-of-function.
In such an event safety protocol required EcoHealth to cease experiments and report its results before going further. It did neither. (pp. 81-82)
Denials & obfuscation
Late 2019, approximately the time the Pandemic began to make news, EcoHealth was due to submit its 5-year-report outlining all its activities and results. It would not do so for two years. Dr. Daszak claimed technical difficulties (p. 71). This denial was investigated and proved to be patently false (pp. 71-77). EcoHealth was instead frantically trying to cover its tracks and eliminate evidence related to its experiments in the years leading up to the outbreak.
As of writing Dr. Daszak is still obfuscating the investigation by refusing to yield the labs notes. Such behavior would be suspicious at best, the diligent research of the Subcommittee would uncover yet more incriminating evidence.
The smoking gun
Investigation shows the virus that causes Covid contains the telltale marks of human interference. The House Subcommittee notes a “furin cleavage site,” a type of protein sequence named for the FES Upstream Region gene (FUR), is found on the SARS2 virus and on no other virus in that branch of the SARS2 family (p. 3).
A few years prior EcoHealth had proposed to create just such a unique virus with a furin cleavage site as its defining feature in their lab at Wuhan (P. 3, 78). The furin cleavage site does not exist naturally in this family of viruses. It could thus only happen through laboratory interference.
Previous outbreaks could always be traced to animal sources; Covid-19 could not
Desperate attempts to locate an animal to host this virus have yielded no results. Previously when dangerous diseases surfaced, investigations were always able to trace such outbreaks to animals that had transferred them to humans. With Covid such investigations have found nothing.
Suspicions
Given the evidence uncovered by the Select Subcommittee, we can summarize the origins of the Pandemic as follows:
The denials continued as people dropped dead in the streets of Wuhan
Yet in spite of all of the above evidence our “experts” assured us that the virus was almost certainly of natural origin and that to consider otherwise was baseless conspiracy theory.
We can trust the “experts,” can’t we?
To be continued
Posted March 19, 2025
______________________
______________________
