What People Are Commenting

donate Books CDs HOME updates search contact

Pro-life Rights, Fatima &
Sede-Vacantist’s Flaw

Delaware to Jail Parents

Dear TIA,

The first State to outlaw spanking is Delaware, and parents can be jailed for up to two years. This is pure stupidity. They could have limited instruments used in spanking such as paddles and straps, instead of outlawing it completely. Jailing parents will cause infinitely more hurt and injury to child than the spanking! It is one more example of the intrusion into the privacy of the family by the godless State.

Read the news here.


     Frank Rega

Pro-Life Lecture

an image of Christ the King with the Sacred Heart and a crown and scepter

Christ the King Law Center (Cklc) Presents:

Your Free Speech Rights as a Pro-Life Activist

Come to learn about your legal rights as an advocate for the unborn. Learn what you can (and cannot) do according to the constitution of the United States and the state of California. Must you comply with everything that the police instruct you to do? What are reasonable (and unreasonable) requests by Planned Parenthood and police in the conduct of your pro-life demonstrations? Your questions will be answered by a licensed attorney in this free seminar.

Can Catholics and Protestants ever unite?

Pro-life Catholics often find themselves working with Protestants and members of other religions in their pro-life work. Is it permissible for Catholics to unite with them against the evil of abortion? Is it true as some say that we need these allies in the fight for the unborn? What does the Church say about this?

Date: Saturday, October 6, 2012

Time: 5:30 pm to 7:00 pm

Location: 70 South Lake Avenue, Floor 10, Pasadena, CA 91101

Please RSVP early by emailing Jorge Pena at jorgepenalaw@gmail.com as seating is limited. Parking is available next to the building on Colorado Avenue and Green Street. Snacks and refreshments will be provided.

Call (626) 372-9692 or visit our website for more information.


A Sede-Vacantist Stumbles in His Logic

Hello TIA,

You know the picture [of the Pope with Devilish Eyes].

When someone constantly looks like devil, writes like devil, speaks like devil and behaves like devil, then he is devil, right?

And you assert that this devil is the pope.

This is the apex of foolishness: to assert that devil can be the pope (if he was elected in a Roman conclave).

If you recognize the devil as your head, you don't have Jesus Christ as your Head. And you go where your devilish head goes.


TIA responds:

Hello P.J.W.,

The Gospel reports that when St. Peter tried to dissuade Our Lord from going to Jerusalem and suffer the Passion, the Divine Master told him: “Go behind me, Satan, thou art a scandal unto me: because thou savourest not the things that are of God, but the things that are of men” (Mt 16:23).

Thus, Our Lord Himself called Peter Satan. According to your logic, he should have been immediately deposed from the Papacy that he had been invested with on a prior occasion, when Jesus Christ declared “Thou art Peter and upon this rock I will build My Church and the gates of Hell shall not prevail against her” (Mt 16:18).

Even though Our Lord callied Peter Satan because he was judging things according to man’s criteria, Christ did not take from him the Papacy. Instead, He forgave Peter and maintained his Primacy over the other Apostles and the Church.

So, we see that your logic - “he looks like devil, writes like devil, speaks like devil and behaves like devil, then he is devil, right?” - is far from being a supernatural way of seeing the Papacy. Rather we would say it is a human way of seeing it.

It is a criterion quite similar to that of Peter when he was censured by Our Lord, is it not? Thus, should we not also apply to you that same epithet of Satan?


     TIA correspondence desk


Prophecies Fit the 'Third Secret'


Thank you so much for the third secret you posted two years ago. I found it very challenging and educational. …

I think the message is authentic for two reasons: The text was so well thought out and the mistakes were so blatant that they had to be done on purpose, and, second, because of the actions of John Paul II.

Since that time I came across the prophecies of Anna-Katarina Emmerick:

On Sept 12, 1820 she said, "I saw a strange church being built against every rule. ... No angels were supervising the building operations. In that church nothing came from above. ... I saw all sorts of people, things, doctrines, and opinions. ..."

On October4, 1820 she said, "When I saw the Church of St. Peter in ruins, and the manner in which so many of the clergy were themselves busy at this work of destruction -- none of them wishing to do it openly in front of others. ... I cried out to Jesus. ... He said to me, among other things, "that this translation of the Church from one place to another meant that she would seem to be in complete decline. But she would rise again; even if there remained but one Catholic, the Church would conquer again because she does not rest on human counsels and intelligence."

     We pray for your success,


Good Forensics Analysis

Lady Marian,

Salve Maria!

I've been reviewing some TIA articles out of the past, and spent quite a lot of time studying two of your articles: "Two Sister Lucys of Fatima?" and "Two Sister Lucys: Photos and Facts."

We, who spent our careers in the field of crime and punishment, had a continuous need to call in experts, all the way from fingerprint experts to polygraph experts to skid-mark experts to handwriting experts to blood-alcohol experts and a cluster of other forensic-scientist-experts ad infinitum.

You may remember the 1996 case in Boulder, Colorado of the murder of the six-year budding beauty queen JonBenet Ramsey. Central to the case was the question of who authored the ransom note. The police called in an expert of a most unusual genre, a Shakespearean author-analyst of textual material named Donald Foster (he identified the ransom-note's author as JonBenet's mother). It was he who broke the case of Theodore Kacynski, the "Unabomber," by identifying the writer.

With what is above-writen, the reason for this email is to compliment you on your very professional analysis of the Two Sister Lucys. The field of experts on facial comparisons is rather small in numbers, used in various police or intelligence investigations. One of the "bibles" of this expertise is a book titled Computer-Aided Forensic Facial Comparisons, (CRC Press, Toronto); there is also a group called FISWG: Facial Identification Scientific Working Group.

The thing that amazed me most is that your articles were written by a scholar with credentials in fields other than facial identification or facial recognition. Please accept my most hardy congratulations on your outstanding articles.

My best to all,

     In Domina,

     Lyle Arnold Jr.


Blason de Charlemagne
Follow us

Posted October 2, 2012

The opinions expressed in this section - What People Are Commenting - do not necessarily express those of TIA