What People are Commenting
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Heretic Marymount & No Mandatory Vax
Trashing Buddha’s Statues
Thank you for your article on Francis receiving Taiwanese Buddhists. The article had compelled me to throw away my Buddha statues. I was also inspired by another article, ''It's Always Dangerous to Dabble in the Occult.''
Before I discovered your website, I took part in Chinese Buddhist services under a group named Fo Guang Shan whose founder was Hsing Yun, who died recently and was featured in the July 23 2006 issue of Church Revolution in Pictures.
R.B.R., Philippines
______________________
For Marymount University God Is Not a Man
Check this one! In the Jesuit Loyola Marymount University a professor penalized a student for referring to God as a Man.
So, all the past Catholic teaching representing God the Father as a father should also be penalized. The fact that the Second Person of the Trinity took the flesh as Man, should not be accepted as well.
Here we see that this paranoia of gender ideology has a short path to heresy.
Not surprised that it comes from a Jesuit university…
This news report was sent to me by a friend.
S.B.
_______________________
Liberal, Modernist & Progressivist
Your site has been a great resource for me to learn about and understand the crisis in the Church. I recently finished reading your book, We Resist You to the Face, in which I learned a lot of new information.
I converted as an adult to the Catholic Church in 2009, and I was not aware of the struggle of faithful Catholics under the pontificate of John Paul II in the decades before I entered the Church that your book describes. I know many Catholics today, especially of a certain age who were growing up in the 1980s and 1990s who are nostalgic for JP2 as a faithful pope who energized the Church. Your book helped me learn about the many disastrous aspects of his pontificate.
But the reason I am writing is to ask clarification about several terms used often on your website and in the book. In describing the errors of our times, you often use words like "progressivist", "modernist" and "liberal" to describe beliefs and actions. It is not clear to me exactly how each of these terms is different.
Do you use them as synonyms with the exact same meaning, or do they each refer to some specific, nuanced difference in beliefs/acts? For example, if Pope Paul VI is described as a "progressivist pope," does that also mean he was a modernist? Of course, modernism was condemned as a heresy by Pope St. Pius X, and thus to describe Paul VI as a modernistor to label his teachings and acts as modernist, sounds like a direct accusation that he was a heretic. Whereas describing him as "progressive" or "progressivist" sounds like it might have a slightly different meaning.
I'm sorry if I missed it, but so far I have not come across precise definitions of these various terms on your website, and I'd be grateful if you can explain how and why you use them. For example, what exactly is the difference between terms like progressivist, modernist, liberal, heterodox, etc.? Maybe there are other related terms as well? They sound similar, but do they all mean the same thing?
Thank you and God bless you and your work,
B.V., Czech Republic
______________________
TIA responds:
Hello B.V.,
We are glad that our work is helping you to understand the crisis in the Church. Even though We Resist You to the Face was written more than 23 years ago, it is still one of the most concise summaries of this crisis, with a clear orientation on how the faithful Catholic should react.
Regarding the terms Liberal, Modernist and Progressivist, we point you to this article by Mr. Guimarães, which explains the meaning of each term.
You will see that Progressivism includes the modernist heresies, but with a broadened field of action and more subtle language to hide the errors, which was the tactic used at Vatican II in the final documents to ensure its success.
It is good to have precise definitions and differentiations for these terms; it is a sign of seriousness that one wants to understand the truly pressing problems of our day.
Cordially,
TIA correspondent desk
______________________
Biden Administration Cannot Impose Vax
I want you to know the happy follow up of a previous notice I sent to you.
The America’s Frontline Doctors’ group won in court on another case. The judges ruled as unconstitutional for the Biden Administration to have mandatory vaccines.
You and your readers can read their news letter here [below].
Keep up the good work.
E.A.
against the Biden Administration's medical tyranny!
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently ruled in favor of over 8,500 federal employees who challenged the Biden Administration's illegal mandate, which required employees to receive experimental injections or lose their jobs.
The court, with 10 of the 17 judge’s ruling in favor of the employees, decided that the Biden Administration didn't have the Constitutional authority to issue the federal employee jab mandate.
AFLDS's legal team filed an amicus curiae brief on behalf of the employees and was proud to assist in the case. AFLDS's legal team noted, "All Americans can be happy that the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, sitting en banc, issued their remarkable opinion on Thursday, completely supporting medical freedom and our constitutional rights to be free of unwanted, unnecessary, and possibly dangerous experimental injections. The Court was very clear that the administration cannot force irreversible medical decisions upon federal employees against their will.”
It's a great day for liberty and America when tyrannical mandates are stopped. America's Frontline Doctors has been fighting for medical freedom since the beginning of the lockdowns. Our legal team has sued the Department of Defense and numerous universities for their COVID-19 mandates, fought against mandates, and we continue to defend doctors who are prioritizing their patients' best interests.
Yours in liberty,
Simone Gold, MD, JD
Founder & President
America’s Frontline Doctors
Posted April 4, 2023
______________________
The opinions expressed in this section - What People Are Commenting - do not necessarily express those of TIA
______________________
______________________
 |
 |
 |
Thank you for your answer to my question concerning Newman's Modernism published in TIA-mail March 31st, 2023 and for the numerous links you show in your answer.
Up to this date I was not aware of the problems concerning Newman...
Thank you
P.C.